易搜题 > 学历教育 > 研究生博士 > 问题详情
问题详情

Text l For more than two centuries,many people have tr/ed to shake that peculiar branch of the tree of knowledge called economics.Perhaps no one has done it better than Richard Thaler,a University of Chicago professor who has challenged the traditional idea that free markets reflect the self-interests of rational individuals.On Oct.9 he was awarded the 2017 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for recognizing that human behavior is very complex.Economic models cannot be easily simplified and must be"more human"by admitting that theories based on sel{-interest are not always correct.Indeed,the field of economics has long been overdue for a humility check.Mr.Thaler showed his own lack of arrogance in his response to the question of how he would spend the$1.1 million that comes with the Nobel Prize:"I will try to spend it as irrationally as possible."In other fields of knowledge,the fact that people do not always act in their own self-interest is pretty obvious.Yet most economists still rely on Adam Smith's 18th-century notion of markets being guided by"the invisible hand"of forces driven by people seeking their own well-being.What is often overlooked is that Smith himself was more complex.He also took a noble view of human behavior.He wrote:"How selfish soever man may be supposed,there are evidently some principles in his nature,which interest him in the fortune of others,and render their happiness necessary to him,though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it."Thaler's work largely focuses on why humans often do things contrary to their own good,such as not saving money for retirement.His theories have created a whole new field called behavioral economics,which looks for ways that either governments or companies can,by using suggestions and positive reinforcement,"nudge"people to take action in their long-term interests.Even this new field is subject to a similar critique.Can governments and corporate officials operate any more rationally in trying to"nudge"people whom they deem too irrational?Scholars Richard Reeves and Dimitrios Halikias argue that trying to influence people's actions is the wrong approach.They suggest that society and its economy are best developed through sel{-effective attributes of character,not paternalistic nudges to change behavior.A humane society,they write,"is one in which men and women possess the discipline,self-command and personal autonomy needed to live with a sense of purpose and direction."Unlike other Nobel Prizes,the one for economics has been given only since 1969.The field remains fluid in its theories.Perhaps a future prize can go to an economist who can take Thaler's ideas even further and show how prosperity relies on traits of character in a society.Models of economics are best built on models of thought.
According to traditional theory,human's economic behavior is_____
A.irrational
B.selfish
C.complex
D.arrogant

未找到的试题在搜索页框底部可快速提交,在会员中心"提交的题"查看可解决状态。 收藏该题
查看答案

相关问题推荐

  • 阎某是某国有企业的厂长,张某是该厂某车间主任,在上任1年多的时间内阎某先后接受他人送来的贿赂10万多元,并在自己任职的企业内为他人提供包括安排工作在内的尽可能的便利。其中有5万多元是通过张某介绍来的人送的,阎某将其中2万元送给张某作酬劳费。张某后来赌钱欠别人一大笔赌债,于是找到阎某,说:“给我点钱花,否则我就告你。”阎某很害怕,于是给了张某1.5万元。但是事过不久,张某又找阎某要钱,阎某说手头没钱,张某要求其将工会活动的部分经费借给自己先用一用,1个月后保证偿还,阎某就把自己保管的工会活动经费2万元给了张某。之后,阎某多次向其催要,但张某一直无力偿还。4个月后,阎某被告发。在被检察机关立案侦查期间,阎某向检察机关提供了市税务局副局长钱某巨额受贿的犯罪线索。经反贪局侦查,侦破了钱某受贿120万元的特大案件。
    根据上述案情,请回答下列问题:
    (1)分析阎某接受他人10万多元贿赂的行为的性质。
    (2)分析张某介绍他人向阎某行贿并从中得到部分“酬劳费”的行为的性质。
    (3)张某向阎某要钱还赌债的行为,构成什么罪?
    (4)阎某把自己保管的工会活动经费给张某用的行为构成了什么犯罪?
    (5)在本案中,张某与阎某是否构成共同犯罪?构成何种共同犯罪?
    (6)对阎某如何处理?
  • 被告人许某(男,15周岁),韩某(男,15周岁),杨某(男,13周岁)。许某、韩某、杨某是同班同学。一日,三人在一起商议弄些钱,便采取顺手牵羊的办法,盗窃同学家的金项链一条、金戒指三个、摄像机一台,价值13000元。但由于引起同学家长的怀疑,三人没有机会再利用这种办法盗窃。许某认为这样来钱太慢,便说:“我们大院的高某是外企的老板,是个有钱的主。我们绑架他的儿子作为人质,要高某用巨额现金赎领。”韩某、杨某听后表示同意。他们商定了绑架高某独生子的具体办法,并到高某之子就读的小学附近查看地形。在此期间,三人发现该小学一个11岁的小女孩很漂亮,且无人接送,便起歹意,将小女孩骗到一地下室,由杨某放风,许某、韩某将其强奸。2004年3月15日早晨7时,许某、韩某、杨某潜伏在高家附近观察动静,见高某驾车将其儿子送到学校后即去上班,遂到学校探明了放学时间。尔后,许某、韩某、杨某一起守候在学校附近。下午4时30分,高某的儿子放学回家途中,被三被告人掳走。与此同时,许某指使韩某用匿名电话通知高某带50万元现金到指定地点赎领,并威胁说:“如果报案,自己考虑后果。”高某接到电话后,立即向公安局报了案。后高某的儿子被三被告掳至野外一僻静处,高某的儿子吵着要回家,三被告烦躁不安,便将高某的儿子放了。但三被告连续数日仍采取打匿名电话的手段,加紧对高某进行威胁,要高某送现款,直至被公安局捕获。
    问:本案应当如何定罪量刑?如果三被告人在劫持高某儿子的过程中,将高某的儿子杀害,应当如何定罪量刑?
  • 最早在法律上规定“诸强奸幼女者处死,虽和同强,女不坐”的是()。
    A.宋刑统
    B.大明律
    C.元朝法律
    D.大清律例
  • Students ofmanagement theory have long l what constitutes the worst kind of book-the CEO autobiography or the management tome that promises to 2 the secrets ofbusiness 3 0ne syllable.But in"Management in 10 Words"Sir Terry Leahy,a former boss of Tesco,has performed a remarkable act of alchemy:combining two dismal forms to.4 an excellent book-a veritable management page-turner that has interesting things to say about everything from the evolution of British society to the art of 5 huge organisations.Sir Terry is an example of a type of Briton that is becoming increasingly 6:a working-class boy made 7 by dint of quick wits and hard work.A scholarship to a local public school and a taste for the grocery business 8 him with a ladder up:he started his career stacking shelves at Tesco and ended 9 as CEO for 14 years.When Sir Terry was 10 to the top job,Tesco was struggling in third place in Britain's supermarket hierarchy behind Sainsbury's and Marks&Spencer.Rumour had it that a tobacco company had toyed with buying the supermarket but 11 the idea believing it would be bad for the brand.Today Tesco is Britain's largest private employer and the third-largest supermarket in the world,12 in 14 countries and offering banking and insurance 13 fruit and vegetables.Sir Terry argues that the secret has been 14 innovation.Tesco introduced loyalty cards in order to 15 information on its customers and encourage them to keep coming back.And the trove of customer information provided by the loyalty card eased Tesco's entry_16 banking and e-commerce.17,Sir Terry readily 18 that there is no science to management:he got the 19 for one of Tesco's most successful innovations-small stores in town centres-from visiting a wholesaler and 20 how much business it was doing selling to small shops.1选?
    A.debated
    B.quarrelled
    C.discussed
    D.argued
  • 汉武帝之后,汉朝的立法指导思想是(  )。
    A.明德慎罚
    B.德本刑用
    C.德主刑辅
    D.明刑弼教
联系客服 会员中心
TOP