请阅读短文，完成此题。Crash. Shatter. Boom. Crash. Shatter. Boom. Smattering of silly dialogue. Pretty girl screams: "Dad! " Crash. Shatter. Boom. Silly di.,dogue. "DAD!!! " Crash. Shatter. Boom, What? Oh, sorry. We were falling into a trance there.Which is, dear moriegoer, what may happen to you during Michael Bay's Transformers: Age of Extinction, the fourth Transformers film and lasts 165 minutes, which is precariously close to the three-hour mark that Bay undoubtedly will reach~by our sophisticated calculations, and at thecurrent growth rate, with his sixth instalment.But let's not get ahead of ourselves. Despite what you've just read, this film will likely be amassive hit because by now, if you're buying a Transformers ticket, you surely know what you'regetting into, and you want more, more, more. And Bay is the Master of More.Or just take it from the I l-year-old sitting next to me, who reserved any audible judgment he, too was in a trance, though maybe from sugar intake--until the moment he saw a Transformerbecome a dinosaur. Overwhelmed by the pairing, he proclaimed, "That's the sickest thing I'veever seen in my life.'" It was as if peanut butter and jelly had been tasted together for the first time.This time, there's a whole new human east. Most important, Mark Wahiberg has replaced Shia LaBeouf as well, Main Hmnan Guy.A significant part of the movie also takes place in China clearly a nod to the franchise's huge market in the country.In any case, we begin in Paris, Texas, where Cade Yeager (Wahlberg), a struggling inventor, is desperately seeking a big discovery,. He's also a widowed dad, and super-protective (as the movieincessantly reminds us) of his high-school daughter, Tessa (Nicola Pehz, blond and pretty andineffective, though the one-note script does her no favours).One day, Cade buys a rusty old truck. Examining it back home, he soon discovers it's noneother than Optimus Prime, the Autobot hero, seriously damaged.As Cade works on fixing him up, his assistant, wisecracking surfer-dude Lucas, has the dumbidea of calling the authorities. What he doesn't know is that the government is plotting to destroyall remaining Autobots in favour of a man-made army of Transtbrmers. He's being helped in thisendeavour by the shadowy KSI Corporation, run by the nasty-but-complicated Joshua Joyce (StanleyTucci).So now, it's evil humans that pitted against the trustworthy Autobots. So much for gratitude.There's also a subplot involving Tessa and her secret boyfriend, Shane (Jack Reynor, underused),whose Irish accent leads Cade to dismissively call him "Lucky Charms" --at least until the twobond in battle.The obvious question: Is it too much for its own good? Bay is very talented at all things visual,the 3-D works well and the robots look great. But the final confrontation alone lasts close to anhour. At some point, you may find yourself simply in a daze, unable to absorb any" further action into your brain.Which of the following statement is wrong?查看材料
A．The sixth Transformer may last for 3 hours.B．The government in the movie wants to set up a man-made army of Transformers.C．In the movie, KSI Corporation stands by the government.D．Joshua Joyce has reported the news about Autobot hero to the government.

相关问题推荐

• 根据提供的信息和语言素材设计教学方案。用英文作答。设计任务：请阅读下面学生信息和语言素材，设计一节听力课的教学方案。教案没有固定格式．但须包含下列要点：?teaching objectives?teaching contents?key and difficult points?major steps and time allocation?activities and justifications教学时间：45分钟?学生概况：某城镇普通中学七年级(初中一年级)学生，班级人数40人，多数学生已经达到《义务教育英语课程标准(20i l年版)》二级水平，学生课堂参与积极性一般。语言素材：?Listen and match the memory with the person.__ Mary a. used to be scared of a teacher with high standards.__ Frank b. remember losing a schoolbag.__ Sarah c. remembers meeting this group of friends.__ Peter d. has enjoyed every year of junior high school.

  查看答案
• 请阅读短文，完成此题。Move over Methuselah. Future generations could be living well into their second century andstill doing Sudoku, if life expectancy predictions are true. Increasing by two years every decade,they show no signs of flattening out. Average lifespan worldwide is already double what it was 200years ago. Since the 1980s, experts thought the increase in life expectancy would slow down andthen stop, but forecasters have repeatedly been proved wrong.The reason behind the steady rise in life expectancy is "the decline in the death rate of theelderly", says Professor Tom Kirkwood from Newcastle University. He maintains that our bodies areevolving to maintain and repair themselves better and our genes are investing in this process to putoff the damage which will eventually lead to death. As a result, there is no ceiling imposed by thereahties of the ageing process."There is no use-by-date when we age. Ageing is not a fixed biological process," Tom says.A large study of people aged 85 and over carried out by Professor Kirkwood discovered that there were a remarkable number of people enjoying good health and independence in their late 80s and beyond. With people reaching old age in better shape, it is safe to assume that this is all due to better eating habits, living conditions, education and medicine.There are still many people who suffer from major health problems, but modem medicine means doctors are better at managing long-term health conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease."We are reaching old age with less accumulative damage than previous generations. We are less damaged," says Professor Kirkwood. Our softer lives and the improvements in nutrition and healthcare have had a direct impact on longevity.Nearly one-in-five people currently in the UK will live to see their lOOth birthday, the Office for National Statistics predicted last year. Life expectancy at birth has continued to increase in the UK--from 73.4 years for the period 1991 to 1993 to 77.85 years for 2007 to 2009. A report in Science from 2002 which looked at life expectancy patterns in different countries since 1840 concluded that there was no sign of a natural limit to life.Researchers Jim Oeppen and Dr. James Vaupel found that people in the country with the highest life expectancy would live to an average age of 100 in about six decades. But they stoppedshort of predicting anything more."This is far from eternity: modest annual increments in life expectancy will never lead toimmortality," the researchers said.We do not seem to be approaching anything like the limits of life expectancy, says Professor David Leon from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. "There has been no flattening out of the best of the best--the groups which everyone knows have good life expectancy and low mortalit_y"he says.These groups, which tend to be in the higher social and economic groups in society, can live for several years longer than people in lower social groups, prompting calls for an end to inequalities within societies.Within populations, genes also have an important role to play in determining how long we could survive for---but environment is still the most important factor.It is no surprise that healthy-living societies like Japan have the highest life expectancies in the world. But it would still be incredible to think that life expectancy could go on rising forever. "I would bet there will be further increases in life expectancy and then it will probably begin to slow," says Tom, "but we just donTt know."Based on recent studies made by various scholars, which of the following factors plays afundamental role in man's longevity?查看材料
  A．GenesB．Eating habitsC．EnvironmentD．Medical condition

  查看答案
• __________ may be defined as any kind of engaging with the language on the part of the learners, usually under the teacher's supervision, whose primary objective is to consolidate learning.
  A．PresentationB．PracticeC．ProductionD．Preparation

  查看答案
• According to Britain linguist F. Palmer, there are no real synonyms. Though“cast” and“throw” are considered synonyms, they are different in__________.
  A．styleB．collocationC．emotive meaningD．regions where they are used

  查看答案
• 请阅读短文，完成此题。Move over Methuselah. Future generations could be living well into their second century andstill doing Sudoku, if life expectancy predictions are true. Increasing by two years every decade,they show no signs of flattening out. Average lifespan worldwide is already double what it was 200years ago. Since the 1980s, experts thought the increase in life expectancy would slow down andthen stop, but forecasters have repeatedly been proved wrong.The reason behind the steady rise in life expectancy is "the decline in the death rate of theelderly", says Professor Tom Kirkwood from Newcastle University. He maintains that our bodies areevolving to maintain and repair themselves better and our genes are investing in this process to putoff the damage which will eventually lead to death. As a result, there is no ceiling imposed by thereahties of the ageing process."There is no use-by-date when we age. Ageing is not a fixed biological process," Tom says.A large study of people aged 85 and over carried out by Professor Kirkwood discovered that there were a remarkable number of people enjoying good health and independence in their late 80s and beyond. With people reaching old age in better shape, it is safe to assume that this is all due to better eating habits, living conditions, education and medicine.There are still many people who suffer from major health problems, but modem medicine means doctors are better at managing long-term health conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease."We are reaching old age with less accumulative damage than previous generations. We are less damaged," says Professor Kirkwood. Our softer lives and the improvements in nutrition and healthcare have had a direct impact on longevity.Nearly one-in-five people currently in the UK will live to see their lOOth birthday, the Office for National Statistics predicted last year. Life expectancy at birth has continued to increase in the UK--from 73.4 years for the period 1991 to 1993 to 77.85 years for 2007 to 2009. A report in Science from 2002 which looked at life expectancy patterns in different countries since 1840 concluded that there was no sign of a natural limit to life.Researchers Jim Oeppen and Dr. James Vaupel found that people in the country with the highest life expectancy would live to an average age of 100 in about six decades. But they stoppedshort of predicting anything more."This is far from eternity: modest annual increments in life expectancy will never lead toimmortality," the researchers said.We do not seem to be approaching anything like the limits of life expectancy, says Professor David Leon from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. "There has been no flattening out of the best of the best--the groups which everyone knows have good life expectancy and low mortalit_y"he says.These groups, which tend to be in the higher social and economic groups in society, can live for several years longer than people in lower social groups, prompting calls for an end to inequalities within societies.Within populations, genes also have an important role to play in determining how long we could survive for---but environment is still the most important factor.It is no surprise that healthy-living societies like Japan have the highest life expectancies in the world. But it would still be incredible to think that life expectancy could go on rising forever. "I would bet there will be further increases in life expectancy and then it will probably begin to slow," says Tom, "but we just donTt know."The underlined phrase "low mortality" in Paragraph 8 could best be replaced by_________查看材料
  A．short life spanB．low death rateC．low illness rateD．good health condition

  查看答案