易搜题 > 学历教育 > 英语考试 > 问题详情
问题详情

Passage Two A hundred years ago it was assumed and scientifically “proved” by economists that the laws of society made it necessary to have a vast army of poor and jobless people in order to keep the economy going. Today, hardly anybody would dare to voice this principle. It is generally accepted that nobody should be excluded from the wealth Western industrialized countries, a system of insurance has been introduced which guarantees everyone a minimum of subsistence (生活维持费) in case of unemployment, sickness and old age. I would go one step further and argue that, even if these conditions are not present, everyone has the right to receive the means to subsist (维持生活), in other words, he can claim this subsistence minimum without having to have any “reason”. I would suggest, however, that it should be limited to a definite period of time, let’s say two years, so as to avoid the encouraging of an abnormal attitude which refused any kind of social obligation.

This may sound like a fantastic proposal, but so, I think, our insurance system would have sounded to people a hundred years ago. The main objection to such a scheme would be that if each person were entitled to receive minimum support, people would not work. This assumption rests on the fallacy of the inherent laziness in human nature, actually, aside from abnormally lazy people, there would be very few who would not want to earn more than the minimum, and who would prefer to do nothing rather than work.

However, the suspicions against a system of guaranteed subsistence minimum are not groundless, from the standpoint of those who want to use ownership of capital for the purpose of forcing others to accept the work conditions they offer. If nobody were forced to accept work in order not to starve, work would have to be sufficiently interesting and attractive to induce one to accept it. Freedom of contract is possible only if both parties are free to accept and reject it; in the present capitalist system this is not the case.

But such a system would not only be the beginning of real freedom of contract between employers and employees, its principal advantage would be the improvement of freedom in inter-personal relationships in every sphere of daily life.

第6题:People used to think that poverty and unemployment were due to ________.

A) the slow development of the economy

B) the poor and jobless people’s own faults

C) the lack of responsibility on the part of society

D) the large number of people who were not well-educated

相关标签: 维持费  

未找到的试题在搜索页框底部可快速提交,在会员中心"提交的题"查看可解决状态。 收藏该题
查看答案

相关问题推荐

  • 在系统效率SE和寿命周期LCC之间进行权衡时,可采用的有效手段是( )。

    A、通过增加维持费使系统的能力增大

    B、通过增加设置费使产品精度提高

    C、通过增加维持费使产量增大

    D、通过增加维持费使产品成本降低

  • 下列项目中不属于寿命周期成本中的维持费的是(  )。

    A、运行费

    B、贷款利息

    C、后勤支援费

    D、人工费

联系客服 会员中心
TOP