()原名伊斯兰文化苑，后改为此名。成立的宗旨是为在台经商的外籍穆斯林子女学习阿拉伯文和伊斯兰教义提供场所，以延续、传播伊斯兰精神，所服务的对象，不仅仅是穆斯林，也包括教外人士。

A.中国回教协会

B.伊斯兰服务社

C.中国回教青年会

D.中国回教文化教育基金会

相关问题推荐

• 第8篇　　亲爱的日本青年朋友们，在座的朋友们：　　今天，我们中日两国青年满怀着喜悦的心情欢聚一堂，举行盛大的联欢会，我谨代表中国青年，向邀请我们参加联欢会的日本青年会，表示衷心的感謝和崇高的敬意。　　这次，我们组织200名中国青年，在日本的几个城市进行了友好访问。我们是满载着中国青年对日本青年的深情厚谊来访问的，请接受我们的友好致意。　　我们每到一处都受到了当地青年朋友们的热烈欢迎和盛情款待，使我们深深感到日本青年对中国青年的深厚情谊。我们不久将要结束这次参观访问回到中国。我们一定把这次访问所感受到的日本人民的深厚情谊传达给中国人民。　　衷心地希望不久的将来能够在中国欢迎你们。　　祝愿中日两国青年共同培育的友好之树根深叶茂、万古长青。

  查看答案

• 中日之间的交往源远流长。郭沫若先生曾在东京中华基督教青年会演讲时指出：“汉委奴国王金印”是“东汉时代的文物„„足证东汉时代中国与日本已经有政治上的密切关系。”下列说法正确的是（） ①“汉委奴国王”金印是汉武帝赐给的 ②“汉委奴国王”金印的出现表明两国政府间友好来 ③当时中日交往关系中国占据主导地位 ④在汉代对中日交往突出的人物是日本的吉备真备

  A、①③④

  B、①②③④

  C、②③

  D、①②④

  查看答案

• 材料三：日本学者井上清在《日本历史》中写道：“公元702年到777年，（日本）曾派使节到唐朝达6次之多。使节的船队大体为四艘。每次都有大批留学生随行，大使以下留学生和水手多达四五百人。”中国史学家周一良在《中日文化关系史论集》中说：“奈良的贵族……举凡学术、技术、文艺、音乐以及佛教和佛教庙宇的建筑、雕刻、绘画、以及有关服饰、器皿、生活方式都在学唐朝。他们的头脑一刻也不忘记“在唐国”。只要是唐朝的东西，无论什么都要尽快地引进来——这是企图让人们看到，日本也是不亚于唐朝的国家。”材料四：在中国近代，赴日留学生数以万计，其盛况不仅在中国留学史上是空前的，也是“世界史上最大规模的学生出洋运动。”在时间上，中国人留学日本比留学欧美晚了数十年，但在人数上，中国留日人数超过了留学欧美各国人数的总和。19世纪末20世纪初中国留日学生情况大事年表

  1895年

  御史杨深秀上奏：日本明治维新功在留学生，请派人赴日学习。

  1896年

  清朝驻日公使带赴日本学习的13名使馆学生为中国学生留日之始。

  1898年

  各省受甲午中日战争失败的刺激开始派遣留日学生。

  1900年

  留日学生达140余人，成立励志会，创办《译书汇编》翻译欧美启蒙思想家名著。又改建“以民族主义为宗旨”的中国青年会。

  1901年

  清末新政开始，官费、私费留学的高潮掀起。当时的留学地域，英美德法俄各国皆有，但东渡日本者占90％以上。留学生秦力山在孙中山支持下创办《国民报》，宣扬革命救亡。这年，陈独秀因宣传反清被迫逃亡日本留学。

  l903年

  留日学生达到1300余人。留学生黄兴、陈天华组织军国民教育会，提倡“鼓吹、起义、暗杀”以“实行民族主义”。此后，留学生在日本东京创办《游学译编》、《浙江潮》等与国内以上海为中心的革命宣传相呼应。

  1905年

  留日学生激增，一年后达到12000余人，以江浙、两湖、广东和四川为最多。这年，孙中山在日本东京成立中国同盟会。 

  （3）根据材料三结合所学知识，日本多次向中国派遣大规模使节船队的目的是什么？推动中日交往频繁的重要因素有哪些？（8分）（4）近代中国留学教育随着民族危机日益加深和民族资本主义发展而演进。根据材料四结合所学知识，指出1895～1906十年间促使中国青少年留日活动兴起和发展的重大历史事件，并概括说明这一现象对中国社会产生的积极作用。（10分）（5）根据材料三、四，说明中日两国间留学教育兴起的共同原因。（2分）

  查看答案
• Where Is the News Leading Us?

  Not long ago I was asked to join in a public symposium on the role of the American press. Two other speakers were included on the program. The first was a distinguished TV anchorman. The other was the editor of one of the nation's leading papers, a newsman to the core -- tough, aggressive, and savvy in the ways and means of solid reporting.

  The purpose of the symposium, as I understood it, was to scrutinize the obligations of the media and to suggest the best ways to meet those obligations.

  During the open-discussion period, a gentleman in the audience addressed a question to my two colleagues. Why, he asked, are the newspapers and the television news programs so disaster-prone? Why are newsmen and women so attracted to tragedy, violence, failure?

  The anchorman and editor reacted as though they had been blamed for the existence of bad news. Newsmen and newswomen, they said, are only responsible for reporting the news, not for creating it or modifying it.

  It didn't seem to me that the newsmen had answered the question. The gentleman who had asked it was not blaming them for the distortions in the world. He was just wondering why distortions are most reported. The news media seem to operate on the philosophy that all news is bad news. Why? Could it be that the emphasis on downside news is largely the result of tradition -- the way newsmen had newswomen are accustomed to respond to daily events?

  Perhaps it would be useful here to examine the way we define the word news, for this is where the problem begins. News is Supposed to deal with happenings of the past 12 hours -- 24 hours almost. Anything that happens so suddenly, however, is apt to be eruptive. A sniper kills some pedestrians; a terrorist holds 250 people hostage in a plane; OPEC announces a 25 percent increase in petroleum prices; Great Britain devalues by another 10 percent; a truck conveying radioactive wastes collides with a mobile cement mixer.

  Focusing solely on these details, however, produces a misshapen picture, Civilization is a lot more than the sum total of its catastrophes. The most important ingredient in any civilization is progress. But progress doesn't happen all at once. It is not eruptive. Generally, it comes in bits and pieces, very little of it clearly visible at any given moment, but all of it involved in the making of historical change for the better.

  It is this aspect of living history that most news reporting reflects inadequately. The result is that we are underinformed about positive developments and overinformed about disasters. This, in turn, leads to a public mood of defeatism and despair, which in themselves tend to be inhibitors of progress. An unrelieved diet of eruptive news depletes the essential human energies a free society needs. A mood of hopelessness and cynicism is hardly likely to furnish the energy needed m meet serious challenges.

  I am not suggesting that "positive" news be contrived as an antidote to the disasters on page one. Nor do I define positive news as in-depth reportage of functions of the local YMCA(基督教男青年会). What I am trying to get across is the notion that the responsibility of the news media is to search out and report on important events -- whether or not they come under the heading of conflict, confrontation, or catastrophe. The world is a splendid combination of heaven and hell, and both sectors' call for attention and scrutiny.

  My hope is that the profession of journalism will soon see its responsibility in a wider perspective. The time has come to consider the existence of a large area of human happenings that legitimately qualify as news. For example, how many news articles have been written about nitrogen-fixation(固氮作用) -- the process by which plants can be made to "Fix" their own nitrogen, thus reducing the n

  A．Y

  B．N

  C．NG

  查看答案